Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 40916 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Black Money Appeal
Pronouncement Date
21-03-2025
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
E
Assessment Year
2018-2019
Judgement Text
" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VP AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM BMA Nos. 13 to 19/Mum/2025 (Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23) Archana Ajay Mittal 62-A, Mittal Bhavan-2, Dr. Gopal Rao Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai, Cumballa Hill S.O., Mumbai-400 026 Vs. DDIT Inv. 1(3)-FAIU Room No. 416, 4th Floor, Scindia House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001 PAN/GIR No. AAGPM 6545 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh Date of Hearing : 21.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 21.03.2025 O R D E R Per Bench: The captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate orders of the first appellate authority. 2. The assessee has filed an application dated 28.02.2025, seeking permission to withdraw the appeals. The content of the said letter is as under: Sub: Withdrawal of Appeal fixed for bearing on 14.04.2025 This is in reference to the above-mentioned Appellant and on the instructions of our client, we hereby state as under- We wish to withdraw the above 7 Appeals from A.Y. 2016-17 to AY 2022-23 as these Appeals have been mistakenly considered as new appeals when we submitted 3 physical copies of the Appeal Memo / Brief on 21.02.2025 before the registrar for sake of convenience of the Bench Members and the Departmental Representative for the appeals having Appeal No. BMA 42/MUM/2024 for AY 2018-19. Appeal No. BMA 43/MUM/2024 for AY 2017-18. Appeal No. BMA 44/MUM/2024 for AV 2022-23. Appeal No. BMA 45/MUM/2024 for AY 2016-17. Appeal No. BMA 46/MUM/2024 for AY 2019-20. Appeal No. BMA 47/MUM/2024 for AY 2020-21 & Appeal No. HMA 48/MUM/2024 for AY 2021-22. E-mail: info@cndindia.com These were the original appeals and were filed electronically on 29.10.2024 and had been fixed for hearing on 31.12.2024. & 17.02.2025 and now adjourned to 14.04.2025. 2 BMA Nos. 13 to 19/Mum/2025 (A.Ys.2016-17 to 2022-23) Archana Ajay Mittal vs. DDIT, Inv. Therefore, we are writing this letter to clarify that the appeals were already filed online, and hearing had begun but the registrar has mistakenly considered our physical brief submissions as fresh appeals and fixed for hearing on 14.04.2025 i.e. on the same date. Therefore, we request you to withdraw these new appeals having Appeal no. BMA 13/MUM/2025 to BMA 19/MUM/2025 (i.e.. 7 appeals) and treat the existing appeals BMA 42/MUM/2024 to BMA 48/MUM/2024 (i.e., 7 appeals) as the final one as it is only a clerical mistake. We also request you to treat the 3 copies of brief submitted before your office towards brief of original appeal. Thanking you, Yours Truly, Sd/- Chartered Accountants 3. The learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) for the Revenue has no objection to the assessee’s prayer. In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to dismiss the appeals as withdrawn. 4. In the result, all the appeals are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 21.03.2025 Sd/- Sd/- (Vikram Singh Yadav) (Saktijit Dey) Accountant Member Vice President Mumbai; Dated : 21.03.2025 Roshani, Sr. PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. CIT - concerned 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File BY ORDER, (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai "
AI summary
The case involves multiple appeals filed by Archana Ajay Mittal against the orders of the first appellate authority concerning various assessment years. The appeals were initially filed electronically but were later mistakenly treated as new appeals when physical copies of the appeal memos were submitted for administrative convenience. Upon realizing the clerical error, the assessee submitted a request to withdraw these appeals, which was supported by the Departmental Representative for the Revenue. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, acknowledging the clerical mistake and allowing the existing appeals to stand as final.
